Logseq Sync: Insights and Alternatives

Disclaimer: This guide was generated by ChatGPT based on discussions from the Logseq forum.

Overview

Logseq’s internal sync feature has been a topic of debate among its users. While some praise its seamless integration, others have experienced significant issues. This guide summarizes the key points discussed by users and offers insights into alternative solutions.

Issues with Logseq Sync

Reliability Concerns

Several users have reported reliability issues with Logseq’s internal sync. These issues include data loss, conflicts, and silent logouts, particularly when working offline. Users noted that changes made offline often do not sync properly when reconnected, leading to lost work.

Development Response

There is a general sentiment that the Logseq development team has been slow to address these issues. Despite multiple bug reports and forum posts, many users feel that their concerns have not been adequately addressed, leading to frustration and a lack of trust in the sync feature.

Syncthing

Syncthing is a popular alternative among users who have experienced issues with Logseq sync. It allows for peer-to-peer synchronization without relying on a centralized service. Users have found it to be more reliable, though some have noted minor conflicts when updates occur on multiple devices simultaneously.

Google Drive Sync

Some users have opted for Google Drive Sync, citing its reliability and ease of use. This method leverages Google Drive’s robust infrastructure to handle file synchronization, reducing the risk of data loss and conflicts.

Manual Backups

Frequent manual backups are recommended as a safety net. Users can automate this process using scripts or third-party software to ensure that their data is regularly saved and can be restored in case of sync failures.

Future Developments

New Database Architecture

Logseq is transitioning to a new database architecture, which is expected to address many of the current sync issues. This new system will use SQLite for local storage and propagate changes to files and vice versa, aiming for more robust and reliable synchronization.

Conclusion

While Logseq’s internal sync has its challenges, there are viable alternatives that users can explore to ensure data integrity and reliability. Keeping abreast of updates from the Logseq development team and implementing regular backup practices can help mitigate risks associated with sync issues.

For more detailed discussions and user experiences, visit the Logseq forum.